A PROBE into the Penola district’s groundwater has revealed a reduced risk in overuse of the resource, with one environment group figure foreshadowing no need for further reduced allocations.
It follows a State Government-ordered scientific review of the Lower Limestone Coast Prescribed Wells Area, which is accessed by around 470 water licence holders.
Environment minister David Speirs announced a short-term freeze on planned water allocations in May last year, calling for an investigation into the issue to help guide the long-term allocation policy.
Mr Speirs will now review findings of the risk assessments and recommendations, with no timeline given for a decision on any policy changes.
The South East Natural Resources Management (SENRM) Board led the probe, which was a collaboration with the Department for Environment and Water, key stakeholders and the wider community.
Penola Natural Resources Management board representative Kerry DeGaris said after reviewing the reports, she believes there will be “no need” for further allocation cuts as the district’s risk assessment has lessened.
“We know the risk assessment shows there is a reduced risk in the Penola area which would mean there should not be any further cuts going forward,” Ms DeGaris said.
“From what we understand, the risk assessment shows there has been a reduction in the risk to the resource and therefore it should be normal caps.
“However, it really is the discretion of the minister as he could do something completely different.”
According to Ms DeGaris, the previous assessment showed the region’s groundwater level was at “high risk”, leading to the introduction of allocation caps.
“The expert panel that was used for the risk assessment this time around have been fantastic as we need a very solid resource and a secure resource going forward,” Ms DeGaris said.
Ms DeGaris also called for more work and monitoring boards within the Limestone Coast.
“We need to keep reminding the minister that we need money spent down here so we can be confident that we are looking after our natural assets.”
SENRM presiding member Fiona Rasheed said “little concerns” were discussed at a recent board meeting “little concerns”, with a majority of input highlighting the need for clarity around the review process.
“Most feedback revolved around the next steps needed to be taken,” Ms Rasheed said.
“There was feedback to ensure the minister was provided with all of the information the board had considered and stakeholders had received.
“As for the outcomes, they are yet to come and what will happen around Penola and other areas is yet to be determined by the minister.”
Ms Rasheed said there was “no clear timeline” in sight for the minister’s response.
